Ole Miss Rebels Football vs Georgia Bulldogs Football Match Player Stats

The Ole Miss Rebels Football vs Georgia Bulldogs Football Match Player Stats from the November 9, 2024 SEC showdown tell the story of one of the season’s most significant upsets. Entering the matchup, Georgia was ranked No. 3 nationally and viewed as a College Football Playoff favorite. By the end of the afternoon in Oxford, Ole Miss had secured a convincing 28 to 10 victory through dominant defense, efficient quarterback play, and timely special teams execution.

For fans, analysts, and bettors, the numbers behind this contest reveal far more than the final score. They show how Ole Miss controlled the trenches, limited Georgia’s explosive plays, forced turnovers, and received standout performances from several key contributors.

This detailed statistical analysis examines the most important player performances, team metrics, turning points, and strategic takeaways from one of the most memorable SEC games of the 2024 season.

Game Overview

Matchup	Result
Ole Miss Rebels vs Georgia Bulldogs	Ole Miss 28, Georgia 10
Date	November 9, 2024
Venue	Vaught Hemingway Stadium, Oxford, Mississippi
Conference	SEC
Georgia Ranking	No. 3
Ole Miss Ranking	No. 16

Ole Miss entered the contest needing a signature win to remain relevant in the playoff conversation. Georgia arrived as one of the nation’s most complete teams. What unfolded was a statement performance by Lane Kiffin’s squad.

Ole Miss Rebels Football vs Georgia Bulldogs Football Match Player Stats

The following player statistics highlight the most influential performances from both teams.

Ole Miss Offensive Leaders

Jaxson Dart (Quarterback)

Statistic	Total
Completions/Attempts	13/22
Passing Yards	199
Passing TDs	1
Interceptions	1
Rushing Yards	50

Dart delivered exactly what Ole Miss needed. While his passing totals were not overwhelming, he consistently made smart decisions, extended drives with his legs, and avoided costly mistakes after an early interception. His mobility created problems for Georgia throughout the game. 

Austin Simmons (Quarterback)

Statistic	Total
Completions/Attempts	5/6
Passing Yards	64

Simmons provided valuable support when called upon. His efficiency helped maintain offensive momentum and kept Georgia’s defense from focusing exclusively on Dart. 

Ulysses Bentley IV (Running Back)

Bentley scored an important first quarter touchdown and helped establish balance in the Ole Miss offense. His production prevented Georgia from selling out against the pass. 

Cayden Lee (Wide Receiver)

Statistic	Total
Receiving Yards	81

Lee emerged as Ole Miss’ leading receiver and repeatedly found openings against Georgia’s secondary. His ability to stretch the field created opportunities throughout the offense. 

Antwane Wells Jr. (Wide Receiver)

The game’s most important passing touchdown came when Dart connected with Wells on a 10 yard scoring strike during the third quarter. That play significantly shifted momentum toward Ole Miss.

Georgia Bulldogs Offensive Leaders

Carson Beck (Quarterback)

Statistic	Total
Completions/Attempts	20/31
Passing Yards	186
Passing TDs	0
Interceptions	1

Beck faced relentless pressure throughout the game. While he completed passes at a respectable rate, Ole Miss consistently disrupted Georgia’s rhythm and prevented explosive offensive plays. The Bulldogs never established sustained momentum after their opening touchdown drive. 

Nate Frazier (Running Back)

Statistic	Total
Rushing Yards	47

Frazier scored Georgia’s lone touchdown and led the Bulldogs in rushing. However, Ole Miss limited the entire Georgia ground attack to just 59 rushing yards, neutralizing one of the Bulldogs’ traditional strengths. 

Dominic Lovett (Wide Receiver)

Statistic	Total
Receiving Yards	41

Lovett led Georgia’s receiving corps, but Ole Miss effectively prevented any receiver from taking over the game. 

Team Statistics Comparison

One of the most revealing aspects of the Ole Miss Rebels Football vs Georgia Bulldogs Football Match Player Stats is the overall team comparison.

Category	Georgia	Ole Miss
First Downs	16	19
Total Yards	245	397
Passing Yards	186	263
Rushing Yards	59	134
Turnovers	3	1
Time of Possession	32:15	27:45
Third Down Efficiency	6/14	4/13

The biggest statistical difference was total offense and turnovers. Ole Miss outgained Georgia by 152 yards while committing two fewer turnovers. Those margins often determine outcomes in high level SEC football. 

How Ole Miss Won the Game

Defensive Dominance

The Ole Miss defense deserves much of the credit for the victory.

Georgia entered the matchup with one of the nation’s most respected offenses, yet managed only 245 total yards and 10 points. The Rebels consistently pressured Beck, shut down rushing lanes, and created turnovers at critical moments.

Several defensive linemen and edge rushers played key roles in collapsing Georgia’s pocket and forcing hurried decisions.

Winning the Turnover Battle

Turnovers often decide elite college football games.

Georgia committed three turnovers while Ole Miss surrendered possession only once. Those extra opportunities helped the Rebels maintain control despite a relatively close first half. 

Efficient Quarterback Play

Dart’s statistics may not appear spectacular on paper, but his efficiency was crucial.

He avoided major mistakes after the early interception, extended drives with his legs, and delivered the game’s most important touchdown pass when Ole Miss needed it most. 

Special Teams Excellence

Kicker Caden Davis played a major role in the victory by converting five field goals.

Many college football games are decided by special teams execution, and Davis consistently rewarded Ole Miss drives with points. His contributions ensured Georgia never had an opportunity to regain momentum.

Key Turning Points

Early Georgia Advantage

Georgia capitalized on an early interception and took a 7 to 0 lead behind a rushing touchdown from Nate Frazier. At that point, many expected the Bulldogs to take control. 

Ole Miss Response

Rather than panic, Ole Miss answered with a balanced offensive attack and began controlling field position.

The Rebels steadily chipped away at Georgia’s defense and entered halftime with a lead. 

Third Quarter Touchdown

The touchdown connection between Dart and Wells proved to be the game’s defining offensive play.

It extended the lead and increased pressure on Georgia’s offense, which struggled throughout the afternoon. 

Fourth Quarter Defensive Finish

Ole Miss completely shut down Georgia’s comeback hopes in the final quarter.

The Bulldogs failed to score during the period, while the Rebels added insurance points to secure the upset. 

Most Valuable Players of the Match

1. Jaxson Dart

Dart’s dual threat ability created problems all afternoon. His passing efficiency and rushing contributions helped dictate the game’s pace. 

2. Caden Davis

Five field goals may not generate headlines like touchdown passes, but Davis consistently converted scoring opportunities and widened the gap between the teams.

3. Ole Miss Defense

As a unit, the defense produced the most impactful performance of the game.

Holding Georgia to 245 total yards and forcing three turnovers against a top ranked opponent is an elite accomplishment. 

4. Cayden Lee

His 81 receiving yards provided Ole Miss with explosive plays and helped stretch the Bulldogs’ secondary. 

What the Statistics Reveal

Looking beyond the box score, several important lessons emerge.

Explosive Plays Matter

Ole Miss averaged significantly more yards per pass attempt than Georgia, demonstrating a greater ability to create chunk gains through the air. 

Turnovers Remain Critical

The turnover margin of plus two was arguably the biggest reason Ole Miss won comfortably. Championship level football teams rarely overcome multiple giveaways against quality opponents. 

Defensive Football Still Wins Big Games

Modern college football often focuses on offense, but this matchup showed how dominant defensive play can completely change expectations.

Ole Miss built its victory on pressure, discipline, and situational execution.

Impact on Both Programs

For Ole Miss, the victory became one of the defining moments of the 2024 season. It strengthened the Rebels’ playoff resume and demonstrated that they could compete with the nation’s elite programs. 

For Georgia, the loss exposed issues with offensive consistency and turnover management. While the Bulldogs remained a national contender, the defeat served as a reminder that even championship caliber teams can struggle when facing aggressive, disciplined defenses. 

Frequently Asked Questions

Who won the Ole Miss vs Georgia football game in 2024?

Ole Miss defeated Georgia 28 to 10 on November 9, 2024. 

Who was the leading passer in the game?

Jaxson Dart led Ole Miss with 199 passing yards, while Carson Beck threw for 186 yards for Georgia.

How many turnovers did Georgia commit?

Georgia committed three turnovers, including one interception and two lost fumbles.

Who led Ole Miss in receiving yards?

Cayden Lee led the Rebels with 81 receiving yards. 

How many rushing yards did Georgia record?

Georgia finished with only 59 rushing yards.

Why was this game significant?

The victory gave Ole Miss one of its biggest wins of the season and strengthened its College Football Playoff hopes while ending Georgia’s momentum as a top ranked SEC contender.

Conclusion

The Ole Miss Rebels Football vs Georgia Bulldogs Football Match Player Stats highlight far more than a simple upset. They reveal how disciplined defense, efficient quarterback play, special teams execution, and turnover advantage combined to produce one of the SEC’s most impressive performances of the 2024 season.

Ole Miss outgained Georgia, forced key mistakes, and received impactful contributions from Jaxson Dart, Cayden Lee, Antwane Wells Jr., Caden Davis, and a dominant defensive unit. Meanwhile, Georgia struggled to establish offensive rhythm and could not overcome its turnover issues.

For fans studying SEC football, this matchup remains an excellent example of how execution and situational football can outweigh rankings and expectations.